
We’ve all been there, purposely playing badly so that our friend wins. It’s not out of pity or leading them into a false sense of security so we can batter them later, it is about letting them in to a world we want them to have fun in.
Of course I never tell them I am over braking or wild firing on purpose, that would spoil the illusion. But I know that if I played as well as I could every game, some of my friends would never play with me. I want my friends to be able to get the same enjoyment out of winning a multiplayer death match as I do, and unfortunately it is not possible in most games without me missing a button press or two. I’m sure many of us have been doing this for years, and sometimes those friends are lured in enough that they will keep playing with us and eventually become a real challenge. However I am getting fed up of having to play nice just so my friends can play against me.
It is nice to see games are finally recognising that not everyone playing will be of the same ability but that should not exclude them from the party. Sports such as golf offer a handicap by which two players can play one another on a more balanced playing field and I think it is something games should look to adopt more.
EA’s ‘all play’ would seemingly be a great solution for allowing a hardcore gaming FIFA fan to play against a dad who found Sensible Soccer too complicated back in the day. The idea on the Wii is that the user can define their level of involvement. You can choose to have access to all the game’s controls and complications or play a stripped back version where you may only be shaking the remote to pass and shoot while the AI judges where the players should go and what the best option really is. Another fantastic example is Guitar Hero’s scaling difficulty, allowing someone who isn’t so good (ie me!) to play against an expert guitar shredder and have a meaningful and close competition.
Some could argue that it is almost cheating to allow the computer to aid you, or penalise you to make it easier for the other person to win. I would argue that I would rather have the choice to have a competitive experience with anyone of any skill level than be forced to play beneath my ability simply because the game does not allow for a handicap.
Perhaps I am wrong and perhaps you like to trounce all comers…I just know if I tried to do that my second controller would probably end up gathering dust.
Anyone got any other good examples of games which allow for skill balancing in multiplayer? Or some ideas for how else it could be done?
proog | 24/10/2008 12:33
Member
206 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
James Bond 007: Nightfire for the PS2 allowed for 4-person split screen and health handicap, which was very good. Best deathmatch multiplayer I’ve played on PS2. Don’t remember about games on other consoles though.
nofi | 24/10/2008 12:34
Wants a custom tag.
4310 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
Goldeneye did, too, I think, as well as Perfect Dark.
Michael | 24/10/2008 12:37
Team TSA: Development
2217 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
Great article. I’m put off playing many multiplayer games because I just can’t compete. A handicapping system would be something I’d be interested in. Although anyone witnessing me at Warhawk would realise that no matter the health handicap, I still wouldn’t be able to kill anyone!
Jeebers | 24/10/2008 12:57
Member
267 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
I have a friend who keeps beating me at Buzz! I need to make them stupiderer. I totally agree though. Handicapping systems are a better option than faking it. You can adjust the health levels or something in Tekken for a similar effect can’t you?
Dafro1989 | 24/10/2008 13:26
Member
629 TSA Points | Member since: Sep 2008
Soul Calibur IV has health and Soul Gauge handicaps.
I’m better than all my friends at games in general (not every game, but most) – the only game that’s a challenge is FIFA against my brother, but that’s because I play every couple of months, and he plays it every day. I still beat him usually too.
That’s why online gaming is a really great thing – it can allow you to compete against people as good as, and insanely better, than you. Especially if you get really competitive with clans etc.
I think, like sports, games are always going to suffer from this problem because two gamers are very rarely evenly matched in every game they play. I’d get destroyed in most Halo matches, but if you put me up against someone on Guilty Gear X2 (or most 2D fighters for that matter), I’d make them look equally silly.
With not-so-interested-in-games friends, it’s best to find a game that’s easily accessible – one where they can feel like they can really do things above the basic basics.
That said, I will gladly take on anyone at Street Fighter IV next year. If it plays like the Alpha games in terms of speed (or Guilty Gear X2), you’re in for some fun ^.^
Michael | 24/10/2008 13:32
Team TSA: Development
2217 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
*Michael ranted and then deleted it*
snowballuk | 24/10/2008 13:59
Member
29 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
I reckon the way some games work online is a bit backwards, for example COD4, the more you play it and level up, the more perks+weapons are made available to you, so as well as having an advantage of being used to the game and knowing the maps inside out, you also have extra stuff to help you. it should be the way round. noobs who dont know how to play or dont know the maps well should have all the good stuff, each time you level up and get better you should lose an advantage, then it would be totally fair. level 50 ppl with basic weapons+perks vs tooled up noobs.
Dafro1989 | 24/10/2008 15:17
Member
629 TSA Points | Member since: Sep 2008
Ewww… then you’d get a plethora of tooled up noobs spouting crap over voice chat about how good they are because they got a Martyrdom kill =/.
snowballuk | 24/10/2008 19:10
Member
29 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
lol the noobs can spout (and do) what they want, i routinely mute everyone in the game. Martyrdom kills suck donkeyballs no matter who it is that uses them in my personal opinion, i dont respect someone so levelled up using such a sneaky perk anyway…i’d be happier for noobs to have it i reckon.
cc_star | 24/10/2008 19:16
Team TSA: Writer
7887 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
That features sounds good on Fifa All Play… it would be good if I could play my day on the PS3’s 09
Never thought about it before. Good Stuff
snowballuk | 24/10/2008 20:58
Member
29 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
can you strip fifa back to the 2002 control system? i used to kick ass at that version, but i REALLY suck at all versions since lol it’s that power bar thing when you press shoot, cant cope with it for some reason lol
SeneorGoat | 25/10/2008 00:26
Member
0 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
Screw my friends i show them how good i am, doesnt matter if your my little 5 year old step sister, ill still own you in a series of games eg. Mario Kart , SSBB , THP8 , Warhawk, Halo 3, Gears
jediryan123 | 19/11/2008 14:25
Member
22 TSA Points | Member since: Nov 2008
ha ha great post