I’m not sure it does really, mostly because Game Room isn’t up and running yet – some would argue neither is Home – but it was too good a headline for me to pass up. Other headlines considered were:
Enough of this nonsense and back to the original point of this article: A light-hearted look at Home and Game Room. First off, when I saw the Game Room trailer, I actually thought it was a Home trailer but with a cartoony new look. All those avatars prancing around the Home Bowling Alley trying to get onto a cab or two. But then it said something about Xbox Live and I realised that it might actually be good.
Game Room is being sold as the place to be if you want to experience over 1000 arcade games over the next three years. Lots of retro goodies too, by the looks of things, but hang on a bit I need to do some maths first: 1000 games over 3 years = 1000 games over 365(ish) days * 3 = 1000 games over 1095 days
Wow. That’s nearly a new game every day. I’m going to be so caught up working out how much real money the required 240-400 MS Points equates to so I can buy these things, that proper games won’t get a look in. Or I could just panic and pay the 40 MS Points for a one-off go on a game. Ooo, I hope they have continues! That’d be so cool, madly trying to enter my credit card number in 10 seconds when I’ve lost my last life. It’ll be like a whole new game. This is better than Home already.
If not better, certainly better focussed. Where Home is all about, seemingly, everything, Game Room appears to be a much more defined experience: Log on, play games, The End. And not just rubbish games like that “golf game” you can play in the EA Sports Space in Home, but decent recreations of actual, playable arcade games.
I used Home a little back in the day. Even set up a TSA Clubhouse. But I lost interest pretty much as soon as the Football object I bought wasn’t at all interactive. I wanted to kit it out with arcade cabs and the like, but Sony just weren’t able to get the tech working early enough. Game Room looks like a different proposition entirely. It’s focussed on games and letting you play them. While the idea of a Clubhouse with games for members is cool, I’m not really sure we need that sort of thing. Just good games and good times.
I certainly won’t miss the Running Man Danceathons.
Home-mockery aside, it has certainly improved over the course of its life. The XI thing was brilliantly executed and I doubt Game Room will feature anything so interesting, at least not in its early incarnations. And Home has seen many new Spaces added, but beyond that there is still the one, major gripe: What is the actual point of logging on to Home? After all this time I still don’t see that there is one. Whereas right now, via a trailer, a product yet-to-be released seems to have all the point in the videogaming world.
Source of video: Joystiq
cc_star | 07/01/2010 12:42
Team TSA: Writer
7847 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
The problem with anything in Home is that it requires you to fire up a bloated, slow app to use it, and it always needs to download bits of itself all the freakin’ time. If game room is more immediate than thet it will work, and it will work well because it will be a unified experience with leaderboards etc…
shields_t | 07/01/2010 13:46
Member
1645 TSA Points | Member since: Oct 2008
I have recently had 50Mbit virgin broadand installed, which ought to make Home far more practical to use. Shame I’m just not even slightly interested any more, and supposedly it’s still in beta!
cam the man | 07/01/2010 13:55
Member
2064 TSA Points | Member since: May 2009
I will be surprised if you get anywhere near 50Mbit.
In the tests that I’ve seen the fastest speed attained was 28Mbit.
cc_star | 07/01/2010 18:25
Team TSA: Writer
7847 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
You can only download as fast as other people can upload – and we all know about Sony’s upload speeds
Doofer_Nasenmann | 07/01/2010 12:50
Member
155 TSA Points | Member since: Mar 2009
The funny thing is that Home is perfectly capable of doing the exact same thing as Game Room. I always wondered why they didnt have more of those arcademachines in Home.
That said, I wouldnt use it anyway. I would play some games just because I can and after that I would loose interest pretty fast. I have lots of classics at home but I dont play them either.
New games with the same old graphics and the same old controls would catch my interest. Like the new old Megaman games.
Deathbrin | 07/01/2010 13:25
Member
944 TSA Points | Member since: Aug 2009
Home was pretty good for Chess as far as i can remember.
cc_star | 07/01/2010 18:25
Team TSA: Writer
7847 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
Because you have to queue for them, sod that!
Deathbrin | 07/01/2010 13:24
Member
944 TSA Points | Member since: Aug 2009
“and GFWL”? With avatars? :O
a inferior race | 07/01/2010 14:03
I'm special
1997 TSA Points | Member since: Jul 2009
If this involves virtual queueing or virtually wandering around to try and find the game I want to play I can safely say I won’t use this either.
Apnomis | 07/01/2010 14:13
Member
731 TSA Points | Member since: Sep 2009
So Microsoft are launching a Home-clone, I wonder how the Xbox fanboys will spin this one!
If you want to wonder around a retro arcade just buy the Namco Museum and visit the Namco Arcade in Home, does much the same thing but without the micro-payments…
I know how the internet is obsessed with having ’rounds’ in the Console War, but so far today from CES I’m hearing from Microsoft about an Arcade based Home-Clone, Dumbed-down Natal Camera, 2-week MW2 DLC exclusive (news they recycled from E3 2009), and from Sony about confirmed updates for HD-3D gaming and HD-3D movies, an expanded all-encompassing PSN service, and 4M units sold over Christmas… Round 1 of 2010 to Sony then?
seedaripper1973 | 07/01/2010 15:54
Member
1727 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
I should CoCo…
Raen | 07/01/2010 21:01
Team TSA: Writer
3719 TSA Points | Member since: Mar 2009
HD-3D was confirmed last year and the PSN service isn’t all-encompassing, I still can’t access anything from a web browser. That’s just terrible.
seedaripper1973 | 07/01/2010 15:49
Member
1727 TSA Points | Member since: Forever
Hmmm, seems like microsoft have been ‘inspired’ from Home..no bad thing..
Cathaloh | 07/01/2010 15:58
Member
121 TSA Points | Member since: Jun 2009
This seems to be a bit too big a step for Microsoft to do. There is only one thing I’m worried about over this new “Game Room”, online perverts who harrass the girls on this. Lets hope there will be something secure about this.
bunimomike | 07/01/2010 21:08
Member
4766 TSA Points | Member since: Jul 2009
I have to agree. The amount of time I get stick for harassing young girls in Home is bloody frustrating. Why can’t there be a secure room for all this to take place in.
Agony is my name | 09/01/2010 17:37
Member
1635 TSA Points | Member since: Aug 2009
Its impossible avatars aren’t realistic