In Germany, Russians Don’t Shoot

MW2's infamous 'nasty' level gets secret censorship.
Published 12/01/2010 at 9:30 by nofi
Related stories (more)
TSA Modern Warfare Master Results [23]
‘MW Duo’ sign to Hollywood Agency. [6]
TSA Modern Warfare Master Participants [29]

I didn’t know about this, so it might not be new news at all, but it appears that if you buy the German version of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 you’re not allowed to shoot any civilians in the infamous “No Russian” level. TSA forum member gernboes alerted us to this bizarre switcheroo and has filmed the scene, complete with the on-screen fail message (which says “You hit a civilian – watch where you shoot”) should you get trigger happy.

Spoilers, naturally, if you’re one of the seven people who haven’t played the game yet.  Seems like Activision censored the scene without really telling anyone, and although it’s not really going to change the game’s story that much it does kind of make the scene a bit pointless – surely the terrorists would be more than a little suspicious?  Seems like in Germany you can’t shoot the good guys – perhaps that’s the way it should have been anyway for every version of the game, Activision, huh?

Comments

Please note that all comments are the opinion of the individual author and not TheSixthAxis.


  1. this game getting too much attention, its only a game.
    morning nofi.


  2. When I first played this level I thought the idea was to fake being a bad guy so I opened fire over the heads of the civilians without shooting at them.  Only when the police turned up and my Russian friends were too useless to deal with them did I shoot the cops, even then I was aiming to wound not kill.


    • lol same here, i thought that we were like a back up team, but when they started shooting i was like what!!!. so i started shooting like after 1 min from the seine.


    • And me. I knew about the scene but wanted to go with my feelings which were ‘don’t shoot the innocent civilians’ and see how the game handled it so I only shot people that were trying to kill me.
      Really I was wondering if you would HAVE to shoot the innocents to keep the terrorists on side cos that would be a new world of controversy!


    • Ditto, I enjoyed shooting up the windows and displays and shooting around the civilians without actually shooting a civilian, it made much more sense within the context of the character and would have made the scene better if there was some kind of morale dilema like a different cut scene at the end of the level (spoilers) where instead of just shooting you he holds a gun to your head and asks you to shoot a civilian – you can either refuse or agree, but either way you end up dead, just with a different cutscene (or even, the game doesn’t continue until you refuse and get shot for being a spy)…

      Personally it was enough to witness the shootings and there was no reason in the plot to get involved (other than for Daily Mail shock value), it would have been enough to pretend to shoot – and it would also make better sense in the plot as to the reason why he shot you at the end. I think all regions should have been like this, it could have even had an Assassins Creed II style ’suspicion’ gauge over the terrorists heads that indicated if they were believing your pretend shooting – you then have to be convincing enough to fool them, but careful enough not to kill and civilians. It would have given a lot more meaning to the level…


      • I don’t think all versions should force you NOT to shoot them but I like the idea of a different cutscene (albeit with the same outcome).


    • You big girls! I shot at the civilians intentionally and even lobbed some grenades!


  3. I shot the people like everyone did. It’s a game keep thta in mind. The video let’s you see what happens when you shoot the civillians but doesn’t show how to clear the part should you jjust walk by or something?


    • You probably just walk slowly with your gun loaded until the police arrives then you have to shoot them.


    • Don’t judge everyone by your own standards friend. I played this section without killing any innocents because a) I wanted to see if you could and b) I have free will and enjoy excercising it!

      It’s fairly hollow anyway becasue if you don’t kill them, the other terrorists do but at least you do have the option.

      And yes, you do just walk slowly through the airport until the police arrive


      • But they’re not ‘innocents’.

        They’re tourists…. Bastards….. I hate tourists. 

        Kill ‘em, kill ‘em all   ;)


      • Plus if they’d upgraded their tickets they would have been safely tucked away in the first class lounge. An important lesson there :)


      • 3shirts – Are you saying that the paupers deserved to be killed but the well off deserved to live? If so, I agree with you. My and Angelina walked through standard class on a plane, never again!


  4. i just had a thought, if they did localised versions of this game, how would that affect the russian version of the no russian level?
    if the rest of the game’s in russian and then in this level the character is told, no russian, do they suddenly start speaking english or something?
    or have they just taken that level out altogether.


    • and anyway, back on topic, i think this is how the game should have been at the very least, talking about the storyline, no law enforcement officer would gun down dozens of innocents just to keep their cover, i can’t imagine there are many that could stand to watch the terrorists do it either, well, maybe judge dredd but other than that.


      • @hazelam – Actually you do find quite morally ambiguous specialists in law enforcement. Those who are willing to break the law and step well beyond most peoples moral limits if they believe the ends justify the means.

        You get serial killers who have no moral problems killing innocents. Scale that immorality back and somewhere between them and the likes of you and me, you have the people who do deep cover work!


    • The level is cut off the game by using a Steam update on the PC before you start the game for the first time. It was not released on consoles so far afaik. The street talk is the copies were printed but never shipped and are destroyed/are going to be destroyed soon. Some people claim they have got for sale a few console localised copies that had avoided such terrible fate, but those who were intended for a neighbor country.


  5. People still not over this scene? Its a game..


  6. It’s only in the game in the first place to create hype, it adds nothing to the story, the outcome is the same whether you shoot anyone or not!

    One for teenage playground talk I think


    • I for one disagree with the people who say it has nothing to do with the story and the game at all. Excuse me, but that is complete bs. The level is what starts the whole story, and the events occurring there are being used as a reason to ignite the war itself. As for those who say – it should’ve been a cut scene – it’s not a Call of Duty style to give you a 10-minute cutscene. CoD series, or rather, MW series (i’ve only played CoD4 and MW2) aim to place you there so you see it happening with your own eyes, be it (spoiler alert!) crawling out of the airplane in pain and looking at a mushroom cloud (end of spoiler), or be placed in a group where you have to shoot civilians to pretend you’re one with the same beliefs that the group has – it’s all your own experience and that is the way MW is.


      • I have to agree, I can never understand why people say the scene is pointless and could have been removed – the plot is daft enough as it is without Russia suddenly launching an attack in the US with no provocation, that is the whole reason they don’t speak Russian and setup the US spy – to make it look that the US attacked Russia first.

        To make a real world analogy it would be like having a game based on the invasion of Afghanistan/Iraq without first showing the bombing of the Twin Towers, to make you see what triggered it…


      • To make a real world analogy it would be like having a game based on the invasion of Afghanistan/Iraq without first showing HOW MUCH OIL THEY HAVE, AND HOW MUCH U.S CONTRACTORS MAKE FROM REBUILDING IT AFTERWARDS to make you see what triggered it…

        Sorry……..couldn’t resist


      • If it is to do with story then why in the hell does it make absolutely no difference if you shoot anyone or not, surely if it was for the story one of terrorists would put a gun to your head if you didn’t shoot anyone? Happens to Bauer all the time in 24

        A Russian attack on US could have been just as easily explained by making a story for that to happen, not a gratuitous scene designed only to provide controversy

        It’s purely there for kids who think violence in movies/games/whatever is cool, and to provide controversy do it gains column inches. Nothing sells a product as well as controversy or a fear of it being banned.


      • @ dirtyhabit, I didn’t say there wasn’t another angenda, just like there was another agenda for the MW2 Russian invasion (from what I remember of the plot), but the point is they needed a ’smoking gun’ and in the real-world that was the Twin Towers attack and in MW2 it was the Airport shootings – something to win over public support/sympathy for their governments chosen course of action…

        Yes it was gratuitous and attracted a lot of (bad) publicity, but I can understand from a narrative point of view why it was included, it’s just that because it’s a game it was blown out of proportion – a film for example would have probably been appaulded for it’s gritty and uncomfortable portrayal of the motivations behind the characters on both sides of the conflict. It could have been handled better perhaps, but I still think it’s a valid level worthy of inclusion in the game…


    • There’s a story? Must’ve missed that one, is it about a forlorn fast food worker caught in a firefight in his place of work and forced to quit his McJob to grow some crazy facial hair and join the marine corps?


      • No but if you write that, i’ll buy it!


      • You could call it ‘McWarfare – With Fries’.


      • ……paging mr Kotick, they could even bundle a special edition with a pewter five mcstars badge and a fake beard.


    • I 1000000% agree with you cc. It’s not just this mission that makes no sense, I hate everything about the single player.


  7. Yeah it is a game after all but still I think Infinity Ward went a bit too far on this though. Quote from the Simpsons “Think of the children” (Reverend’s wife) I think lol.


  8. Dont see what the big deal is about this scene. Jeeze we’ve been killing innocent victims in games for years. GTA anyone.


    • Agreed.


  9. this is no suprise to me at all. there are heaps of games, movies, etc, that are cut here. some even branded with a 100% uncut sticker and guess what, they’re still cut. that’s why i like to order the english copies of things from play or game. well that, and my german is total rubbish.


  10. Regarding the massive conversation up there, the story is practically non-existant and confusing, so I personally don’t think that it makes a difference to the story whether you shoot them or not.


  11. I killed as many as possible.
    I use games as escapism, so whether its mowing people down in Liberty City, killing soldiers on Helghan or racking up bad Karma on Fallout 3, makes no difference – its only a fucking game, get over it. 


  12. I always suspected that MW2 WAS somehow censored in that level for Germans.


  13. Yay, Front Page! :)
    And as somebody asked how the rest of the level plays, just like the uncut version if you choose not to shoot… you watch your terrorist-friends shoot the place up while walking slowly to the point the police arrives, whom you are allowed to kill…


  14. those seven people are going to pay a lot less for the game ill have you know! the launch and current pricing is ridiculous!