360 Final Fantasy XIII Comes On Three Discs

Three - it's a magic number.
Published 02/02/2010 at 11:00 by Kovacs
Related stories (more)
FFXIII Coming Home [20]
FF13 Becomes HMV’s Biggest Launch [17]
Final Fantasy XIII Sales Could Be Huge [29]

GameFly are claiming you’ll be getting off your arse twice if you buy Final Fantasy on the Xbox 360 as the non-PS3 Blu-ray flavour will come on three DVDs.  Square have said this morning that you’ll need to swap disks twice during the game.

Of course, us ancients can remember switching four discs (and many more floppies) during the bygone days of gaming, so this really shouldn’t be much of a problem.

We’re more concerned about reports that the 360 version is allegedly not matching its PS3 cousin in other departments such as the game’s visuals. Sure, we all know about the compressed audio trade-off on the 360 version, but the reduced capacity of the medium on Microsoft’s platform may also be the cause of why textures are apparently less crisp.

Final Fantasy XIII launches on one Blu-Ray and three DVDs in March.

Source: Kotaku

Comments

Please note that all comments are the opinion of the individual author and not TheSixthAxis.

  1. The Blu-ray was examined to be 6.8gig (the max size Microsoft allow a game to take up on a DVD9) game content and 32.6GB of movies


    • That sounds like Square Enix all over…


    • So the game itself IS limited to 6.8gig because of the X360!

      32.6GB’s of fluff. It better be pretty.


  2. So which version will look the best? ;)


  3. Bit disappointing


    • But not unexpected..?


      • yes


      • Don’t you mean ‘no’?


    • What did people on Xbox expect? I’m glad this has happened, it shows Squenix isn’t lowering the quality to fit it onto a single DVD.

      Also I’m annoyed the box art isn’t the traditional one with simple white background and title. Maybe Xboxers might not know what the game is about unless there’s a pretty picture on the front, lol. I know you can get it with the Limited edition version, just thought I’d mention it :)


  4. 360 titles often have lower resolution textures and lower qualiy audio, but after about 5-10 minutes of playing the game, unless you’ve got both running side by side, it won’t really matter.

    What WOULD matter is if the 360 or PS3 version have significant frame rate issues or screen tearing, etc, because those can pretty distracting.


    • Very true, but we shall see, but not soon enough!


    • Since when did 360 titles have crappier graphics? I don’t own a 360 but AFAIK Most are slighty superior. The Sabotuer, Bayonetta, Fallout 3, Ghostbusters, The Orange Box, so on. 


      • Yeah, I agree. ;)


      • But they were made on a 360 engine then ported over to the PS3 , with FF it’s the other way around ( for a change )


      • Those were probably made for the Xbox, then ported to the PS3. however FF XIII was made on the PS3 and “ported” to the Xbox.

        I say “ported” as I heard they didn’t simply transfer the data to Xbox but instead tried hard to maximise the potential from the Xbox as they are two different pieces of hardware. Something other developers could learn alot from :)


      • It’s not relevant for FF because they’ve split the assets across multiple DVDs – but I’m not necessarily talking about multiplatform games. The resolution of your average texture asset in Uncharted is larger than Halo 3 for example. Say for a face or body segment, or for the tiled ground textures. This is just a storage concern, it has nothing to do with the 360’s ability to process the graphics themselves.
        Often they don’t make higher resolution textures for games ported over from Xbox so you don’t see a quality increase. Like AC2, the PS3 version is blurry by comparison, they go OTT with anti-aliasing so you don’t notice.
        Like I say, it’s not a big deal unless you’re literally running both side by side. I played AC2 on the Xbox and then on the PS3, my enjoyment of the PS3 version wasn’t less because of the blur. Average consumers don’t really care.


    • From the vague reports we’re hearing out SquEnix’s road show over in the States this doesn’t seem to be an issue. Just texture difference. Really waiting for the Digital Foundry review.


  5. I hope I don’t offend any 360 owners but I should bloody hope the PS3 version looks a lot better . The 360 version is a port from the PS3 and ever since it was announced as multi platform there have been reports that the visuals have been downgraded from the original .
    Which doesn’t really seem very fair considering it’s an amazing title that should never ever be held back from it’s potential .


  6. For the record people

    Both games were developed independently from each other, using shared assets.

    The game on the Blu-ray takes up 6.8GB of disc space, this is the exact size that Microsoft allow a game’s content to take up on a DVD9, there is a 32.6GB of movies (that would include the movie’s audio) I would suggest that because of Blu-ray space there has been zero time and effort (and therefore money) spent on compressing this.

    The differences would be minimal, and to see them the game will need to be ran through analysis software, of the type the Digital Foundry use to do their Face-Offs.


    • Yes that’s the point. If the game came on one DVD9 you’d know you were getting lower res textures, but it isn’t and you aren’t. You just have to get off your ass and swap the DVDs over ever 20-30 hours. Chances are you’d be up for a coffee by that point anyway.


      • So which one shall I buy?


  7. Im sure most xbox owners (if they have the space, thats another topic) will install the game anyway


    • Unless MS have the foresight to make the first DVD okay to authenticate the content on all three discs you’d still have to swap regardless of install.


  8. All Xbox owners are fat ugly bastards who need to move around, the exercise will do them good. :D :D :D


    • Wont stop them from being ugly though ;)


  9. Its no big deal, like cub says we had to do this loads and loads way back when. This is being done to maximise the games quality. Simples.

    Is this the first ‘next gen’ game to go multi disc then?


    • ooops…my bad Kovacs article, not Tuffcubs. Sorry!


    • Na, Blue Dragon came on 3 DVD9s I think.


      • er…how did you get that ‘Tends to spoil major games.’ moniker??


      • That would be nofi’s doing.


      • Bloody favourites…


      • Nofi, I want a custom tag. :(


  10. Umm… That is hardly any news?


  11. 3 disks, lucky them. will they have to pay more?


    • I think they should. Surely 3 DVDs would cost more than one blu-ray.Also doesn’t MS charge developers extra for every extra disc they use to try to deter devs from doing it too much?


      • All platform holders charge $6-$10 for each disc released on the platform to the developers/publishers… I wonder if SqEnix got special dispensation on that in order to release the game on the 360… they probably did,

        MS broke their own rules all the time… like the (now old) HD rule about games needing 720p minimum, but allowing Bungie, Infinity Ward & Rockstar to release sub-hd games in Halo, CoD & GTA


      • One rule for one, one rule for another I guess ;)
        They’d be stupid to get FF on the 360 then ask “Oh btw, can you make sure it’s only one disc please?” lmao


  12. 3 Discs is still better than the 30 floppy discs it took to install the old Championship Manager games on the Amiga.


  13. So glad I have the Playstation 3; one disc, but I won’t be buying Final Fantasy anyway.


  14. There was a load of content the programers had already made when it was still a playstation exclusive but was removed because of the xbox so if that content was kept in there might have been 4 discs. Unless there planing on releasing it as DLC its a bit of a waste of the programers time.


  15. The last nulti- disk I played was FFIX on the PS1, four disks of pure heaven… (at the time)