XI
you are not logged in
Review

Minecraft Review (XBLA)

Block by block, we'll get back to yesterday.

It has been a while, I’ll be honest. Despite my past championing of the game, I haven’t opened Minecraft in months and haven’t actually sat and played it since Christmas. There are a number of things that have caused this, such as not knowing the game inside out like I once did due to an influx of new features and moving on to other games, but it’s mostly because I burnt out. I spent a year and a half playing the game without really taking much time away from it so I just had to move on for a while. It lasted much, much longer than any other game I have ever played.

It’s still there, though, sitting on my start bar; the only game to have ever earned a quick launch shortcut. I’ve always intended to go back, too. Notch’s time sink has swallowed hundreds of hours of my time already, so when I found myself being given Minecraft XBLA I realised it was finally time. When the opening splash screens appeared on my TV – a blocky version of the Microsoft Game Studios logo followed by Mojang’s own – I felt goosebumps run down my back, and when the main menu loaded? I smiled. It just looks like Minecraft’s menu, but a bit different – a few more options, perhaps, but it’s Minecraft right down to the entertaining splash message over the logo.


It's got sheep.
After the initial shock, I played the tutorial. Yes, there is a built in tutorial and it will work wonders for newcomers. It’s one of the better tutorials I’ve played in a game, dropping the player into a pre-made world with on-screen pop-ups to tell the player what to do and introduce them to the mechanics of the game and controls. You’re limited to a little grove with a couple of chests next to lakes with boats and fishing rods that spawn pop-ups to ask if you want instructions on how to use them or not. There’s a half built wooden shack that you’re tasked with fixing up, complete with windows and a door. It’s a great introduction and even served to introduce me to the controls and the new crafting system effectively.

The vague shape you had to make when crafting items in the PC version was a feature I liked, mostly due to it requiring more know-how than just ‘get these, press a button’, you had to know what to do with them. In this version, you just collect the things you need, open the crafting window and select what you want to craft from the menu. In fact, you can go to a workbench and it’ll show you every single thing that can be crafted in the game, exactly what you need to craft them and let you know what you’re missing. At first I found this distasteful, but then realised that I had, in fact, looked everything up on the wiki or seen it in Youtube videos when I was first playing the game and promptly shut up.

The inventory is brought up with a press of the Y button and uses a mouse cursor that’s controlled by the left analogue stick to select and move things around. This is horrible, but you can also use the d-pad to jump the cursor between boxes, which is infinitely easier to control. Other than that, the inventory is the same, minus the crafting area (which is opened by pressing the X button).

Minecraft XBLA is Beta 1.6 in all its glory. The features, the¬†quirks and the bugs are all here, along with a couple of new bugs that I’ve noticed. There was a rather strange malfunction with a furnace which duplicated a fish when I was cooking it that corrected itself somehow and another where water did not disappear after I removed a water source that, again, corrected itself a few seconds later. There’s also the infamous Minecraft lighting error which consists of a small area of a few blocks or so that are completely dark, though it fixed itself after I moved a few blocks around.


Nothing says Minecraft like cavernous underground rooms.
Graphically the game looks like Minecraft; it doesn’t look great until you play the game and know all about it. Then the mountains gain a kind of majesty and staring into the dark of a cave evokes an oppressive feeling of dread that defies the simple make-up of the game itself. It performs admirably at what is definitely an equivalent to far view distance. Sometimes, there can be a lag between placing a torch and the light spreading but it is momentary and very rare. It seems to be darker indoors than it should be, possibly a result of the use of smooth lighting which had a similar effect on the PC version of the game, too.

The controls are obviously the really major difference here. The biggest and most obvious are the analogue sticks; movement is analogue now, which is good, but aiming is also analogue, and that’s bad. You’ll probably have to tweak the sensitivity to suit your own preferences as the default seemed far too slow, but either way, placing blocks is a little awkward at times although it’s not enough of a problem to affect the game once you’ve played a while. The bumpers are used to scroll through the items in your active inventory, forcing me to rearrange how I organise them slightly in order to avoid unwittingly trying to destroy creepers with the diamonds I am so desperately trying to protect.

Pros:

  • The modified crafting system makes the game far more accessible.
  • Maintains exactly what makes Minecraft so addictive.
  • Tutorial smooths the learning curve considerably.
  • A near perfect port.
  • It’s Minecraft on a console!

Cons:

  • If you already have and play Minecraft it’s difficult to recommend.
  • Based on Minecraft 1.6 so it’s missing a lot of newer features and improvements of the PC version.
  • A few small bugs, though they aren’t really intrusive.

All in all, this is as faithful a conversion of Minecraft to console right down to the music – even the seeds work. It’s an older version so it’s missing a lot of the features of the latest PC version, but it’s very much the Minecraft I fell in love with all that time ago. If you’ve wanted to play all this time but had a PC that gave up when it came to actually running it or even if you’ve played the PC version but have always wanted to play it with a controller from your sofa, this is exactly what you want. I’ll post an update on the multiplayer once I’ve had chance to try it out properly but until then, this gets my blocky seal of approval.

Score: 9/10

Read more: #
35 Comments
  1. gazo69
    Member
    Since: Forever

    I’m really looking forward to this, I have only played the pocket edition but got bored quickly!

    Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 17:12.
  2. gazo69
    Member
    Since: Forever

    I was wondering, is it possible to have a bit on reviews like the release date and maybe a price?

    Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 17:15.
    • Gamoc
      Member
      Since: Forever

      It releases on Wednesday though I’m not sure of the price myself. Quick Googling turns up 1600 MSP.

      Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 17:19.
      • gazo69
        Member
        Since: Forever

        Thanks! I know it’s easy to google but just think it would be good to have all the details of the game that’s being reviewed on the review page.

        Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 18:05.
    • tonycawley
      Pint! Pint!
      Since: Feb 2009

      I’ve always asked for an info box in reviews but gave up asking as it never happened. Should include:
      Formats
      Price
      Release date
      Download or retail
      Trophies/achievements? (y/n)
      Developer
      Publisher

      Wouldn’t be too difficult to add but would answer a lot of questions in one small box.

      Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 18:41.
      • nofi
        One for all.
        Since: Forever

        I’m building something that will help in this area, sorry it’s not there yet but we do only have very limited resources for development.

        Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 19:11.
      • tonycawley
        Pint! Pint!
        Since: Feb 2009

        Sorry didn’t mean that as a dig (if that’s the way it came across).
        I don’t see why it would take any kind of development cost though (excuse my ignorance) all you need to do is put a box in the review with that info in!

        Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 19:43.
      • uncleniccius
        Member
        Since: Jan 2012

        I agree completely. Trophies/achievements will always be there, so I don’t think that’s needed. As far as I know the only Playstation/360 games that don’t have to have achievements are mini’s, PS2 games (Not HD remakes) and PS1 classics. I

        Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 20:42.
      • tonycawley
        Pint! Pint!
        Since: Feb 2009

        Well there’s quite a lot of exceptions to the trophies/achievements rules, especially with the recent swathe of re-releases. For example they’re doing a resistance triple pack but res1 will have no trophies.

        Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 21:00.
      • uncleniccius
        Member
        Since: Jan 2012

        I know what you mean. But all PS3 games after 2008 have to have trophies, and all for xbox have to (I don’t know a date). I still think the box is needed though, they have it in magazines.

        Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 21:18.
      • tonycawley
        Pint! Pint!
        Since: Feb 2009

        Lol, you’re missing my point!

        Games are still getting (re)released without trophies, albeit games we’ve seen before. There’s still confusion so the box would help for such things as the resistance triple pack or any other re-releases of games that first came out in the days before mandatory trophies.

        Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 21:32.
      • uncleniccius
        Member
        Since: Jan 2012

        Oh! I see… If a game doesn’t have trophies, maybe they should specify? The number of titles that don’t have them is very low though.

        Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 21:44.
      • PriceofWar
        Member
        Since: Mar 2012

        Quite a lot of exceptions? I can only think of Resistance FOM which doesn’t even matter as TSA don’t need to review it. Maybe have something like ‘Achievements/Trophies (50/51)’ the extra 1 being a platinum trophy (if it has on). All for the others.

        Comment posted on 08/05/2012 at 08:35.
      • david24
        Member
        Since: Feb 2011

        there are loads of games without trophies that are pre 2008, not just FOM.

        Comment posted on 08/05/2012 at 10:19.
      • PriceofWar
        Member
        Since: Mar 2012

        Yes plenty of games don’t have trophies but we’re (or at least I am) talking about games that are coming out now. Resistance FOM came into this because it had a double/trilogy pack come out not so long ago and FOM remained without any trophies because they just bundled the games together. If you can find at least 10 reviews of PS3/360 games in the past 3 years without trophies I could understand the y/n idea but I still think the #/# would be a better system. There’s my case for no real reason :)

        Comment posted on 08/05/2012 at 11:33.
  3. GhostViper
    Member
    Since: Aug 2008

    Even though I play this a lot on my PC, I wouldn’t mind having this on my PS3.

    Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 17:37.
  4. PoorPaddy89
    Member
    Since: Aug 2009

    Never played this on anything and I just can’t see the appeal. It seems that I’m the one who’s the odd one out, though.

    Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 17:46.
    • stage1
      Member
      Since: Feb 2012

      I’m the same, this really isn’t my type of game.

      Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 18:38.
    • tonycawley
      Pint! Pint!
      Since: Feb 2009

      Same for me mate, sounds like the kind of game to me that just eats your life away, takes hours to construct anything. Never played it and I doubt I ever will, no disrespect to those that do though, I’m sure it’s right up some people’s street, just not mine!

      Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 19:45.
  5. Burgess_101
    Member
    Since: May 2009

    I dont understand why you would choose this over the PC version. Minecraft truly comes alive with the mods. Vanilla Minecraft can get boring quickly.

    Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 18:21.
    • Gamoc
      Member
      Since: Forever

      For the reasons I stated in the last paragraph. Plus, I don’t play with mods.

      Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 18:33.
      • Burgess_101
        Member
        Since: May 2009

        I know its just Minecraft runs on even the most low-end of PC’s. You need to use mods to get the most out of Minecraft. Tekkit for example is such an amazing mod )or compilation of mods) and adds a ridiculous amount to Minecraft all from an easy to download launcher from their website.

        http://www.technicpack.net/

        Try it out!

        Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 18:54.
      • Gamoc
        Member
        Since: Forever

        Minecraft is notoriously resource intensive and always has been. It’s gotten better than it was but it most certainly doesn’t run on the most low end of PCs.

        And I said I don’t play with mods, not that I don’t know how to. I’ve used some before now but I find that it’s just not worth it, I prefer vanilla.

        Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 19:06.
      • Burgess_101
        Member
        Since: May 2009

        Ive played it on low-end PC’s before no problem. Well you’re missing out on Tekkit, makes the game feel a whole lot bigger and dynamic.

        Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 19:23.
  6. Deathbrin
    Member
    Since: Aug 2009

    It’s all great as a review, except it doesn’t actually say what the game is about? It’s all about “well i’ve played on PC and it’s just like that”

    Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 19:17.
    • nofi
      One for all.
      Since: Forever
      • Deathbrin
        Member
        Since: Aug 2009

        Thanks!

        Comment posted on 08/05/2012 at 11:03.
    • gaffers101
      Member
      Since: Oct 2008

      I was thinking just that. Anyone that’s never tried Minecraft (I know they exist), will still be in the dark.

      Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 19:25.
    • Gamoc
      Member
      Since: Forever

      Yeah sorry about that, I was assuming previous familiarity based on having covered it three times before, I probably should have provided links. Nofi has posted links, I recommend starting with this one as it’s the first article on TSA about the game:
      http://www.thesixthaxis.com/2010/11/14/minecraft/

      Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 21:40.
      • IAmJacksMedullaOblongata
        Member
        Since: Nov 2011

        Every review should stand on its own feet. You should never assume your audience is familiar with anything other than the very basics. Like, you don’t need to say how a controller works for instance! :)

        To be honest, this review doesn’t really read like a review of the game but as someone who’s already overly familiar with Minecraft and is just comparing it to a previous incarnation.

        Sorry, just my opinion, but I don’t think this was a very good review.

        Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 21:57.
      • Gamoc
        Member
        Since: Forever

        I disagree – any review of a Call of Duty game assumed knowledge of the series, and FPS review assumes knowledge of the genre. Assuming knowledge is necessary to write a review in the first place. A few links or a quick recap might have helped but I don’t think I went the wrong way when I reviewed it.

        Comment posted on 08/05/2012 at 08:58.
      • Deathbrin
        Member
        Since: Aug 2009

        Well that was for the PC, those not interested in the PC would just skip those.

        Comment posted on 08/05/2012 at 11:02.
  7. uncleniccius
    Member
    Since: Jan 2012

    I haven’t played Minecraft, but bought points and renewed my XBL (set to expire today) in anticipation!

    Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 19:48.
  8. wick15
    Member
    Since: Jul 2009

    So torn with this. I love Minecraft, but have neglected it over the last 6 or 7 months due to Uni and the servers I played on shutting down or changing sadly. I want to get back into this so badly and I reckon getting it for my Xbox may just do that. As said above though, it’s hard to justify it if you have the PC version. I’ll have to think about this. I have recently started playing it again on my own PC with a server I host, but it’s hard to host a server 24/7. That wouldn’t be a problem on the Xbox version.

    Comment posted on 07/05/2012 at 21:00.
  9. An-dz
    Member
    Since: Oct 2010

    Nothing Beats the satisfaction of building a gaint fortress with your mates on this, dont expect it to last long on a public server though as someone will come along and knock a massive hole in it “to see whats inside”. Always wanted this on PSN so i could run a proper privte server that wouldnt make my laptop melt after an hour.

    Comment posted on 08/05/2012 at 11:50.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Latest Comments