you are not logged in

Medal of Honor and EA Are On a Break

Danger passed.

Medal of Honor: Warfighter didn’t meet expectations. It was released in a peak period, amid much hype and many millions of dollars in marketing but generally poor critical reception (it’s got 53-55 on Metacritic) and a less than stellar reception at retail preceded a tepid response from fans (it’s got 5.2-5.8 on Metacritic’s user scores).

Well, EA seems to have realised that it might be best to keep the Medal of Honor brand on a shelf for a little while. During an investor call yesterday, EA’s COO – Peter Moore – said that the company was “taking Medal of Honor out of the rotation, and have a plan to bring year-over-year continuity to our shooter offerings.” So there’ll still be a CoD contender in that all-important Q4 sales period.

Moore continued by accepting the collective judgement on Danger Close’s shooter, saying that “Medal of Honor was an obvious miss. The game was solid, but the focus on combat authenticity did not resonate with consumers.”

While it is obvious that the game was a “miss,” it’s debatable whether that was because of the authenticity in the setting or any one of myriad problems pulled out during its review process. In fact, it was never the “authenticity” that seemed to be a sticking point in any review I read. Moore goes on to say that “critics were polarized and gave the game scores which were, frankly, lower than it deserved.”

It’s difficult to say that a game’s scores were polarised, given that Metacrtic’s PC listing for the game lists a single “positive” review (from a German website called “PC Games”). It lists six “negative” reviews (from sites like PC Gamer and IGN). There are 23 “mediocre” reviews. I’d say that’s fairly squarely in the “mediocre” range, skewing slightly towards “negative.”

Hopefully, it’s just in the public message that EA is endeavouring to avoid the real issues and privately, they’re having serious discussions about what the problems really were and how to fix them. Danger Close did manage to get some things very right with the series’ reboot and it would be a shame to just write it off completely.

Perhaps having a new title in their “rotation” will give EA an opportunity to allow something with a little more polish to be put out in the weeks before Activision’s all-conquering shooter distracts everyone again.

Source: Polygon

  1. quinkill
    Since: Oct 2010

    I didn’t even consider this after the last Medal of Honor game. Nothing to do with combat authenticity, everything to do with gameplay, story, UI, multiplayer.

    Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 00:21.
  2. avengerrr
    Since: Oct 2012

    I don’t see why EA need to release a second shooter. BF3 seemed to successfully target the market with a different style MP and of course a tailored PC experience; FPS formula’s are tricky as it is. Last MoH I truly enjoyed was Airborne, which was incidentally and unique approach on WWII combat.

    Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 00:24.
  3. Starman
    Since: Jul 2011

    Translation = we hoped that all the fancy adverts would make people ignore the bad reviews & buy it anyway.

    Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 00:31.
    • Nickboss1
      Since: Mar 2010


      Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 01:19.
  4. teflon
    Community Team
    Since: May 2009

    I think that’s a good move from EA. Danger Close now have a perfect opportunity to exploit the early days of the next generation and hopefully build a new IP for themselves, which can stand toe to toe with the rest of the market…

    Sadly, I’m not so sure they’ll be able to take it, unless they’ve already had a core team laying the foundations for the last year, so that they can have already shifted into full development for the new consoles. If they’re not already firing on all cylinders, they’ll not have a hope in hell of releasing something good for 2014’s Christmas mash up…

    Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 01:24.
  5. doomsday619
    Since: Nov 2008

    Bring back the Bad Company games to replace it.

    Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 07:35.
    • Bilbo_bobbins
      Since: Jun 2009

      Agree with that, much more fun.

      Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 13:18.
  6. Youles
    Since: Feb 2011

    I find it’s lack of success amusing, after EA’s constant childish comments and jibes towards CoD (even though they’re quite justified), serves them right! Looking tired MoH?

    Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 08:39.
  7. LTG Davey
    Since: Aug 2008

    Glad to hear it. Stick with Battlefield EA, its actually good.

    Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 08:57.
  8. Tuffcub
    On the naughty step.
    Since: Dec 2008

    *raises hand*

    Scuse me.. everyone forgotton about.. erm.. damn.. forgotton their name! Ha! Ironic! . The ex Infinity ward peeps. Them. That game.

    Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 09:13.
    • Eldur
      Since: Nov 2012

      Respawn Entertainment.


      Fascinating. Simply Fascinating.

      Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 09:15.
      • Tuffcub
        On the naughty step.
        Since: Dec 2008


        Location: http://www.respawn.com/games
        Access has been blocked as the threat Mal/HTMLGen-A has been found on this website.
        Return to the page you were previously viewing.

        Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 09:22.
      • Eldur
        Since: Nov 2012

        Good thing I’m on my work PC!

        Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 09:28.
  9. Eldur
    Since: Nov 2012

    I might be the odd one out here, but I really enjoyed the campaign of the ‘original’ Medal of Honor (the first entry in the reboot, as opposed to the WW2 one). I thought it was refreshing to be part of a single military action, played out from a variety of perspective, that seemed genuinely authentic with only a limited amount of Hollywood sheen.

    Several scenes stand out in the memory. Arriving by quadbike to clear an insurgent camp at night, leaving a helicopter (along with my battalion) into a valley of death and a brilliant ‘last stand’ moment in a gradually disintegrating rammed earth shack; the latter’s one of the only war-game moments that genuinely made me question my chances of survival and made me want to ‘live’. As the game limited itself to one campaign, it told a much more convincing story of war and was all the more affecting for it.

    I was massively disappointed that Warfighter seemed to forego all of that only to become another ‘me-too’, world hopping, macho shooting gallery.

    Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 09:27.
    • McProley
      Since: Aug 2011

      I totally agree, I thought the first was brilliant storywise.

      Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 09:47.
    • Peter Chapman
      Team TSA: Editor
      Since: Forever

      I really liked the first of the rebooted series too.

      Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 10:24.
    • blast71
      Since: May 2012

      Agree. 1st Medal was a great game, bought it for a tenner new and loved it. Better than the last few COD’s IMHO, although BLOPS 2 was a return to form.

      Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 17:03.
  10. mclarenrob2
    Since: Jul 2012

    Im definitely not buying Call of duty this year, its pointless! Ill buy it again next gen if they have a complete overhaul and new engine.

    Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 09:42.
    • Bilbo_bobbins
      Since: Jun 2009

      and dedicated servers.

      Comment posted on 31/01/2013 at 13:20.

Latest Comments