Where is Game 3.0?

18 months on, how close are we to realising Phil Harrison's brilliant dream?
Published 15/08/2008 at 8:21 by glennpfc

Game 3.0 was a term banded about by then President of Sony Computer Entertainment worldwide studios, Phil Harrison, at GDC 07. The term was meant to inspire a movement akin to that of Web 2.0. A social era of gaming where the users were given control over their playing experiences. 18 months on, how close are we to realising Phil Harrison’s dream?

Game 3.0 “…puts the spotlight back on the consumer,” said Harrision. The major focus is on user-content and social networking. Two things very much alive in the online spaces we use every day. This is something clearly being watched carefully by the games industry, a view backed up by Dave Karraker, senior director of corporate communications at Sony Computer Entertainment of America .

“It would be very difficult for anyone to ignore the influence sites like YouTube, Grouper and MySpace have had on our society in recent years. Put simply, this is what a great number of the consumers in the video game demographic are doing for entertainment and communications. You will see a dramatic increase in community-based and user-created content in video games in the next few years, if not months. ”

What does this term even mean to us as gamers? Is user-generated content today’s sweat shop as a certain N’gai Croal put it or is it a vehicle for us to express our creativity? Do I really want to create my own fun; Isn’t that what I am paying for when I buy my disc? Playing devils advocate aside, user-created content can become a real mess of crap, just looking around Youtube is evidence enough of that.

The biggest games of the year so far? Grand Theft Auto 4 and Metal Gear Solid 4, barely a whiff of “Game 3.0” about them. Looking past these blockbusters, have there been any steps in the right direction? Buzz TV allows users to create their own quizzes, Singstar allows users to upload videos and PSN now has its own achievements Trophies. However these are mere baby steps in the grand scheme of things.

Sony’s poster children for this movement are Home and LittleBigPlanet. While the latter is on track for an October launch Home is still missing in action for most of us. Home as a concept still has all the hallmarks of the future of social networking, but in practice will it really be the next big thing? Is LittleBigPlanet the tip of the user-created iceberg or is it just a blip on the gaming radar? Game3.0 clearly isn’t the answer to everything. Would Bioshock be a better game if users could create new levels? I doubt it, but then Echocrome has been very successful at leveraging from it. Over the coming months, when LBP and Home are unleashed, perhaps we will find out if Phil’s vision is really the future. I await with baited breath.

What do you think? Game 3.0 the future of gaming…or a niche genre?

Comments

Please note that all comments are the opinion of the individual author and not TheSixthAxis.


  1. 3.03.03.03.03.03.0


  2. I think it’s LBP that is going to really kick-start this Game 3.0 ideal. It’s going to be community-driven games like LBP that will drive Game 3.0 more than Home will, but I do think Home will be a great complement to the games.


    • So do I

      But there are times you just want to turn your machine on, have a quick game of fifa/eden or something similar and turn it off, not sit there for hours designing levels etc…

      user created content will enhance the gaming market, but not change it

      …cause gaming is fun, not homework


      • Absolutely, I think you’re spot on, mate.


    • Yeah I think so to Michael. LBP looks awesome. And I also think that Home will continue LBP’s success in Game 3.0.


  3. LLB is a good start, but its a one off. i cant see myself buying other games to sit there making levels all day, id rather play the game. it will be a nice change from shooting and killing things (WHICH SEEMS TO BE THE ONLY GAMES THAT GET RELEASED NOWA DAYS, eden was a nice change), but i cant see “3.0″ being that big…people still like PLAYING games.


  4. I think user-content is something we have all had for years. I remember spending hours on Smackdown’s create-a-wrestler years ago. It’s obviously more interesting now we can easily send levels to each other, but even back then I was printing out all the details of other peoples creations and painstakingly going through it to create a copy.

    What I hope will be new and exciting is where we can go with social network gaming. Logging onto PSN maybe I will be greeted with a message saying Nofi has beaten my top score on Superstardust, or that Michael has posted a video up from Eden. Just look how excited Xbox fans have been over Geometry Wars 2 and it’s in your face leaderboards and see how that could extrapolate across an online platform like PSN.

    Maybe Home will be the answer to that. Instead of calling it a second life clone maybe it can actually be the Facebook of gaming.


    • Interesting point re. Facebook. I think that’s where Game 3.0 will take off, once these disparate experiences are linked together. I do worry about the solitary aspect being lost from gaming. Mind you, I remember playing Gotham on Xbox, and I was blown-away by how cool it was that even during the single-player game I was still linked up to my friends. XBL is way ahead on that score.

      It’s an interesting time, no matter what.


  5. Hmmm…. I’d say everything in moderation. Not every game in the future would necessarily have to be ‘Game 3.0′. Depends if the glove fits the hand.