XI
you are not logged in
Review

Resident Evil: Operation Raccoon City Review (PS3, Xbox 360, PC)

Survival horror sans the horror.

Some people might say that Resident Evil: Operation Raccoon City is a natural progression for the franchise. With each new release Resident Evil has become more action orientated, so an out-and-out shooter was inevitable. Does it actually work, though? Well: yes and no.

Set in Raccoon City, the Umbrella Corporation learns that one of its top scientists, Dr. William Birkin, is planning to sell the experimental ‘G-Virus’ to the US Government. You form part of a team of Umbrella Security Service soldiers who have been ordered to enter Birkin’s lab and secure the only known sample of the virus.

Things don’t go to plan though, and Birkin ends up injecting himself with the virus, which mutates him into a huge creature. During the ensuing battle the deadly ‘t-Virus’ is leaked into the sewers, before spreading throughout Raccoon City and infecting the population. Your team has a new mission: eliminate survivors so that no one can tie Umbrella to the outbreak. Yes, you’re the bad guy.

It’s important to note that the game takes place during the events of Resident Evil 2 and 3, with elements from those games cropping up in the narrative. As you play you’re given what-if moments, such as whether or not you kill Leon Kennedy, which will certainly add an extra dimension for die-hard fans of the series.


Hunters focus on lone players.
A third person shooter, the main campaign can be played with up to four players, which can be a mixture of online partners and AI bots. There are six character classes to choose from, all of which have unique abilities.

“Four Eyes”, for example, has an ability that can actually make creatures fight for you, whilst “Beltway” can lay laser trip-mines. All the abilities can be bought, and then upgraded, by earning XP. XP is also useful for unlocking weapons, of which there are many, spanning different classes such as rifles, machine guns and shotguns.

Split up into several chapters, the main campaign sees you traverse the environment to a checkpoint, trigger an event before moving on to the next checkpoint. Whilst this may sound a bit boring, what makes the game stand out is the Resident Evil universe. For example, moving between checkpoint A and B might involve gunning your way through a horde of zombies, a pack of Hunters, or a Tyrant (or perhaps all three).

One of the most heart-stopping moments in the game was walking through the city and hearing a primordial scream in the distance; knowing that sooner or later I was going to run into whatever made that noise.

There’s also a risk of infection from zombie bites, and once infected you have a short amount of time before turning into a zombie and attacking your team-mates. Luckily the old Resident Evil stalwarts are on hand, such as the anti-virus, green herb and a myriad of grenade types. You can’t pick up too many of these items at once, but always make sure you have one of everything. You can also revive downed team-mates, although this leaves you vulnerable for a few seconds.

The infected aren’t your only worry, however. The US Special Ops are on the ground and not too happy with you, so expect plenty of resistance from them.

The Special Ops team aren’t just an opponent though, they can also serve as rather useful bait. Wounding one so that he bleeds will attract every zombie in the area, leaving you relatively untroubled. What? We’re the bad guys, it’s our job to be nasty!

To complement the third person perspective, Capcom have introduced a cover system. Just running towards a relevant object, such as a pillar, will see your character snap to it. From there you can either blind fire, or use the shoulder buttons to look down the iron-sights for a more accurate shot.

In all honesty it needs some work, and comes nowhere close to rivalling the cover system in games such as Gears of War. The main problem is identifying what can actually be used as cover; at times you’ll run up to something and be left standing as your character refuses to snap to it. Other times, for reasons unknown, the game wouldn’t let me aim down the sights whilst in cover.

Melee combat, or “CQC” as it’s known, is also incredibly weak, with no sense of impact when attack an opponent. In fact, this can be said of a lot of the ranged weapons too. Playing a game with Aran and Blair, the comment was made that the guns felt like pea-shooters. Shooting zombies is fine, as they react by exploding into a shower of blood and entrails, but shooting the bigger creatures yields no reaction whatsoever; not even a bit of recoil.

Graphically it’s all a bit flat, too. Animations are stiff and there only seems to be a couple of character models for the zombies. Obviously I’m not suggesting every zombie be different, but it’s hard to take things seriously when you mow down an entire wave of what looks like the same person.

When you’re done with the main campaign, which should be about five to six hours at the very most (depending on the difficulty level), there are a number of online multiplayer modes to choose from. The first thing you’ll notice is that whilst the modes have different names, they all boil down to “your team, versus another team, versus zombies”.

Heroes mode sees you play as, or against a team of favourites like Leon, Jill, and HUNK. If you’re a hero you simply have to survive attacks from both the U.S.S and the legions of creatures milling about. Heroes don’t respawn, and if you get killed you’ll be placed on the U.S.S team to hunt down your former team-mates.


You'd better be heavily armed when a Tyrant appears. Or just run away.
Survivor sees your team face off against another team whilst fending off creatures and waiting for a helicopter to arrive. The kicker is that once it does turn up there isn’t enough room for everyone, so cue a big fight for space.

Then there’s a team battle that, wait for it, sees your team face off against another team whilst fending off creatures. The difference this time is that every kill your team makes, be it creature or opposing team, gets added to a meter at the top. The first team to fill their meter wins.

The final mode has you collecting vials, but unfortunately during the many hours trying the game, their didn’t seem to be anyone playing to try the mode out with.

Whilst they may not be all that varied, the online modes are fairly enjoyable. The addition of creatures really does spice things up; no matter what part of the map you’re on there’s always something trying to kill you. Speaking of maps, they are taken from the main campaign and there aren’t nearly enough of them, which may well be the biggest issue people will have with this game. You’ll see it all pretty quickly and then want something new.

For the most part the online experience was smooth enough, although the team battle seemed to suffer quite badly from a number of problems. One had me suddenly moving to other parts of the map, whilst another saw me respawn without being able to see my character – all I could see was my team-mates on their player cams. The opposing team also seemed to be glitching to various parts of the map, making it impossible to keep track of them (needless to say they could quite easily see us).

Pros

  • A solid shooting system.
  • A fair amount to unlock and upgrade.
  • The chance to explore Resident Evil through the eyes of the bad guys.
  • The Creatures really add an interesting dimension.

Cons

  • Looks bland.
  • Weak melee.
  • Cover system needs work.
  • Some online problems experienced.
  • Not enough multiplayer maps.

Resident Evil: Operation Raccoon City is by no means a bad game. The chance to face off against Resident Evil favourites such as Nemesis is a really interesting idea, and the constant threat of zombies will always have you on edge. Saying that, I can see the multiplayer modes becoming repetitive fairly quickly. Whilst differing slightly, the modes on offer are too similar, and all play out on the same handful of maps.

If Capcom supports this game like Zipper did with MAG I can see it turning out to be something rather good. It’s just not quite there yet.

Score: 6/10

13 Comments
  1. Eldave0
    andUandU
    Since: Aug 2008

    :( Darn

    Comment posted on 20/03/2012 at 16:11.
  2. kjkg
    Member
    Since: Apr 2010

    The screenshots don’t look too bland but I’ll take your word for it. Interesting read, just makes me want to go play RE3 though.

    Comment posted on 20/03/2012 at 16:13.
  3. Sympozium
    Member
    Since: Aug 2009

    Didn’t expect much from Slant Six, shame though

    Comment posted on 20/03/2012 at 16:18.
  4. Foxhound_Solid
    Is a smart cookie.
    Since: Dec 2009

    Thought it was gonna be ace. Still fair review and some fun to be had by the sounds of it.

    Comment posted on 20/03/2012 at 17:27.
  5. colossalblue
    Team TSA: Editor
    Since: Forever

    Seems like a decent bunch of co-op mates and a love for the series would make this enjoyable enough but it doesn’t do enough to appeal to the masses (or the 3rd person cover shooter fans).

    Comment posted on 20/03/2012 at 17:37.
  6. The Lone Steven
    Never heard of him.
    Since: May 2010

    It’s not a Resi game imo. Plus, i think they asked Micheal Bay for ideas and thus this was born. They should have limited ammo, made it very easy to get overrun by the zombies.(The slow type) and make you think about every shot.

    Excellent review Dan. Tbh, i wasn’t expecting this to be a masterpeice.

    Comment posted on 20/03/2012 at 17:52.
  7. bigmac175
    Member
    Since: Jan 2009

    Well that’s disappointing :(

    Comment posted on 20/03/2012 at 19:10.
  8. An-dz
    Member
    Since: Oct 2010

    I heard about the infection chance thing, apprently rather than curing it its much more efficent to shoot the injected person in the head and kill them, as they will shortly respawn with more health and ammo than they otherwise would have had,

    Comment posted on 20/03/2012 at 19:44.
    • Dan Lee
      Common like the rest of us.
      Since: Jun 2010

      And you get a trophy :oD

      Comment posted on 20/03/2012 at 19:50.
  9. dextreme08
    Member
    Since: Jun 2009

    Any idea about split screen? This feature normally decides whether or not I buy games these days

    Comment posted on 20/03/2012 at 20:05.
    • Dan Lee
      Common like the rest of us.
      Since: Jun 2010

      None.

      Comment posted on 20/03/2012 at 20:35.
  10. aerobes
    Member
    Since: Aug 2009

    Sounds like a lot of fun, especially if you have other people to play with. I was a little surprised to see a 6 when I reached the bottom. Nevertheless, it’s the written word not the score which means most to me and while I wouldn’t want to spend $60 on it, it’s most definitely on my radar.

    Comment posted on 21/03/2012 at 05:27.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Latest Comments

TSA Meets

  • None today