11
8
8
29
23Bloomberg, via MCV, yesterday reported that Xbox Live may have made $1 billion last financial year. It seems that Microsoft were talking subscription figures with the financial news service, and revealed that last year 25 million people paid for a Xbox Live Gold subscription, certainly some very impressive figures for the service. When you plug the cost of a subscription into the equation that comes out a cool $600 million netted by the Seattle giant.
What’s that you say? $600 million is $400 million less than $1 billion? Luckily my highly tuned journalistic brain also spotted this discrepancy, and read on. In combination with the big chunk of change earned from subscription fees Dennis Durkin, COO of Xbox and someone I’ve never heard of before, announced that for the first time ever Xbox Live made more money from content than subscriptions. So that means at least another $600 million in revenues. Now along with journalism my brain is also capable maths, although I get a bit lost when people start using letters. What? Are numbers not good enough for you?
Anyway, take $600 million and add another $600 million and you get $1.2 billion as the minimum number for Xbox Live’s revenue last year. Sadly, Durkin doesn’t give any indication of how much more than subscriptions content generated, or how much of that revenue was profit, but still $1.2 billion in revenues is pretty impressive by most standards.
Of course, we don’t have much in the way of comparison as I can’t find any figures for the PSN and Valve doesn’t need to publish any revenue figures if they don’t feel like it. However, these kind of numbers are a clear indication as to why Sony wanted in on the subscription model.
08/07/2010 at 11:36
Member since: Jul 2009
But Live and PS+ are really different. You almost ‘need’ Live to use the full functionality of the 360, while PS+ is just extra stuff.
08/07/2010 at 14:38
Member since: Aug 2008
i guess thats why its called Plus/+. Its just PSN+extras. LIVE is called live as your 360 needs it to live.lol
08/07/2010 at 11:38
Member since: Jan 2010
Aaaand in another 20 years it might pay for the RROD fiasco.
08/07/2010 at 11:46
Member since: Jan 2010
That’s an American billion not a real one then I assume.
08/07/2010 at 11:48
Member since: Jan 2010
Still an unfeasibly large pile of dough though.
08/07/2010 at 12:10
Member since: May 2009
almost everything you read refers to billion as an american billion, when you see the newspapers say we are so many billion pounds in debt, its still an american billion (i.e. 1000 million)
08/07/2010 at 12:23
Member since: Nov 2009
According to Oxford dictionaries a billion is now a thousand million in British English and the original meaning dropped.
08/07/2010 at 12:28
Member since: Apr 2009
Was there snother meaning for billion? What was it?
08/07/2010 at 13:16
Member since: Nov 2009
A million million.
08/07/2010 at 16:21
Member since: Jul 2009
You have to let go of the old British million. Globally, a billion is a thousand million. Anything else will be corrected. Ah, bask in the globalisation. :-\
08/07/2010 at 12:34
Member since: Jun 2009
So that’s the revenue, does anyone know how much it costs to actually run the service?
If they’re making massive amounts of profit then they could massively boost their public image by shaving a few quid off an annual Gold sub.
08/07/2010 at 16:47
Member since: Feb 2009
Pretty impressive figures there.
08/07/2010 at 17:06
Member since: Feb 2009
There was a Dr. Evil joke to be made here. I’m disappointed.
08/07/2010 at 17:46
Member since: May 2010
no wonder kotick wants a share, microsoft are getting all the money when call of duty has been on top 10 charts since it came out.
08/07/2010 at 22:24
Member since: Jun 2010
Not got my cash…Free PSN online play for me.