XI
you are not logged in
News

Black Ops II Screenshot Comparison is Totally As Expected

Does it really matter?

This shouldn’t really be surprising to many but, given that Black Ops II will probably be the year’s biggest release, it’s worth pointing out. Someone on the Beyond3D forum has posted a screenshot comparison that doesn’t cast the PlayStation 3 version in a great light. The 360 screen has notably more detail in the textures and the PS3 version is a little bit fuzzy.

Of course, screenshot comparisons are often a little pointless. We all know by now that over-aliasing and mild texture blur is a common occurrence on the PlayStation 3. Does that make the game any less enjoyable? Well, no, it’s barely noticeable unless you look at it right next to the sharper 360 screen. But it will irk the PlayStation fanboys that this late in the console’s life cycle – after so many utterly gorgeous looking PS3 games have appeared – they’re still suffering from this kind of issue.

It’s worth noting that the Call of Duty games have never been natively HD anyway, too. They always upscale, and generally look quite nice in doing so. We’re probably at least a year past the point when Activision would have assumed their flagship shooter would have been transitioning to the next generation of hardware too so perhaps we can hope for more parity between the big console manufacturers for next year’s Call of Duty release.

And, if you’re curious as to what Call of Duty might look like on the next generation of consoles, just wait until we start to see the slew of high-resolution PC screenshots.

29 Comments
  1. Taylor Made
    Member
    Since: Oct 2011

    They look identical to me. Either way cod sucks

    Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 14:43.
    • KeRaSh
      Member
      Since: Nov 2009

      You might want to get your eyes checked.

      Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 16:19.
  2. Dom El
    Member
    Since: Mar 2012

    It’ll be interesting to see what the Wii U version is like too. Absolutely agree though that it’s an annoyance that these kind of problems are still occurring with cross-platform games on the PS3.

    Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 14:45.
    • Alex C
      One for all.
      Since: Forever

      Apparently Wii U version is lovely, looking better than the 360 one.

      By some accounts the PS3 version is a mess – low res, frame rate stutters, bad transparency effects…

      Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 15:25.
      • bmg_123
        Member
        Since: Feb 2012

        That sounds terrible and all, but (supposedly) it happens for a reason. It’s likely down to a poor port, but the issue with 60fps games is that the lag between SPU processing is great enough (again supposedly) to have a detrimental effect on control response, and so SPUs are not used fully in COD games, hence the performance issues. This could likely be fixed with a new engine, but I think we all know Activision will keep ahold of this ancient one for as long as possible…

        Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 16:11.
      • cc_star
        Team TSA: Writer
        Since: Forever

        More than what’s gone before… just about every multi-platform game, ever?

        These things only seem to be noticeable if they’re running side by side, if at all, to the human eye… rather than analysis software.

        For example, transparencies often look odd under analysis, but are fine in motion – even Killzone 3, with all the PS3 programming expertise (albeit half framerate of CoD with advantages that offers for amazing graphics) renders transparencies at 1/4qtr resolution… sounds awful in an internet comment, but affect in-game particularly whilst in motion? Probably non-existent.

        Texture detail has been an ongoing problem on PS3 since… forever, everything from GTAIV, Mafia2, RDR, Fallouts, AC … etc – Just about everything outside of Dante’s Inferno, which as far as I know is just about the only game which is reportedly as near identical as its possible to be.
        The number of multiplatform titles that have a ‘win’ for the PS3 is massively dwarfed by the opposite, even after all this time – as screen tearing of Dishonored and framerate slowdown of Borderlands 2 highlight.

        Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 17:39.
  3. cc_star
    Team TSA: Writer
    Since: Forever

    Everything I’ve read about the game sounds great, couldn’t care less.

    Loved BlOps and am disappointed it’s not still cold ware era, but the changes sound great.

    Ability to fail missions and the story with branching story lines, the more open areas rather than shooting down imaginary corridors, even down to choosing classes & loadouts in campaign not just multiplayer. The multiplayer changes & improvements sound good to.

    Sure it would be nice of the graphical fidelity matched the industry leading framerate, but it’s just not possible on these consoles.

    Bring it on!
    Although I need to beg, borrow or most likely steal some money from somewhere to get in this time around. :(

    Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 14:45.
    • Bilbo_bobbins
      Member
      Since: Jun 2009

      I have to say, after slating COD for a few years, this one actually looks interesting. The graphics don’t look any better than previous years, but the change of guns and especially gameplay on this one looks much better. Score streaks in particular look so much better and will not over load the matches and be match winners, thank god.

      Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 15:12.
  4. Awayze
    Member
    Since: Jul 2010

    Good thing COD is usually on offer every year. Wouldn’t pay £40 for COD.

    Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 15:01.
  5. JBoo
    Banned
    Since: Oct 2011

    This comment is hidden.

    Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 15:07.
    • cc_star
      Team TSA: Writer
      Since: Forever

      Not surprising seeing as they run at half-speed.

      CoD has prioritised fast gameplay, everyone else has prioritised some pixels & stuff.

      As to what people prefer… that’s down to the individual, but it’s hard to argue the most popular game has got it wrong. Next-gen CoD will need to pull something out of its sleeve though, as PC’s show other titles run at CoD’s framerate and have a higher level of graphical fidelity.

      errrm LoL;)

      Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 15:19.
    • The Lone Steven
      Never heard of him.
      Since: May 2010

      Stop being a fanboy. Please just stop it. Also, Haddock is better. COD is okay but Haddock is in top plaice.

      Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 15:58.
      • Bilbo_bobbins
        Member
        Since: Jun 2009

        You’re making me feel eel with these terrible puns

        Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 16:31.
      • The Lone Steven
        Never heard of him.
        Since: May 2010

        What a crabby pun.

        Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 17:11.
  6. Nickboss1
    Member
    Since: Mar 2010

    The only COD I like is the one you eat.

    Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 15:32.
  7. SpikeyMikey23
    Member
    Since: Jul 2009

    The CoD haterzzzzzz are out! ;) iSnIPEezCoolBaNgYaMam and gang will be raging!….. :D

    Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 15:36.
    • kjkg
      Member
      Since: Apr 2010

      Surely if yourmumandme is banned that would be too ;)

      Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 15:43.
      • The Lone Steven
        Never heard of him.
        Since: May 2010

        Nope as Gtown’s jimmy savile account is still active. :O

        Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 16:09.
    • Youles
      Member
      Since: Feb 2011

      God Mikey, you missed the “cool” letters. All CoD names should start and end like this:

      ii_xX_iSnIPEezCoolBaNgYaMam_Xx_ii

      I’m very much looking forward to this CoD – zombies, the single player, and multiplayer in that order. No doubt I’ll manage 1 prestige but going by MW3, I can’t see myself dedicating too much time to multiplayer, not if your killstreak rewards are still pointless and can be taken down immediately. I’m just not too fussed about competitive multiplayer anymore, whatever the game, I’m more of a co-op kinda guy! ;)

      Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 17:00.
  8. The Lone Steven
    Never heard of him.
    Since: May 2010

    Seems like this wasn’t newsworthy as i don’t recall there being other screenshot comparison articles. Am probably wrong though. Also, i doubt anyone plays COD just for the graphics. ;) Predict it will smash records again. But where is the damn chips with chilly sauce DLC? You can’t have COD without chips. *is shot for that.*

    Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 16:01.
  9. Severn2j
    Member
    Since: Aug 2008

    Doesn’t really look good on either console really, but COD was never about graphics anyway

    Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 17:39.
  10. Kennykazey
    Member
    Since: Mar 2010

    Lazy developers. CoD is one of the biggest IPs of the generation and after countless releases, it still looks like a launch-title. I loved CoD4, it was intuitive and daring, but the franchise has become a joke. I hope Activision will try to actually make a defining game out of it for next gen, like 4 was.

    Comment posted on 12/11/2012 at 18:29.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Latest Comments

TSA Meets

  • None today